Survey suggests public unconvinced by smart motorway safety | Smart Highways Magazine: Industry News

Survey suggests public unconvinced by smart motorway safety

Share this story...Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someonePrint this pageBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on Tumblr

Eight out of ten drivers think that removal of hard-shoulders on smart motorways has made motorways more dangerous than four years ago, according to an AA Populus poll of 20,845 drivers. 

The motoring organisation says some drivers even refer to the lay-bys on these motorways as ‘death zones’.

The AA says it raised concerns over smart motorway safety in a recent letter to the new Transport Secretary, Chris Grayling MP.  Prior to that the AA raised the issue with the Road Safety Minister, Highways England CEO and the Transport Select Committee.

It says t he main concern is the lack of lay-bys when the hard-shoulder is used as a running lane for the 130,000 AA members (and thousands of others) who breakdown on motorways each year.  The Highways England guidance is for the Emergency Refuge Areas (ERA) to be no more than 2.6km apart (approx 1.5 miles) whereas the AA would like to see at least twice as many lay-bys and they should be twice the length.

“If a car breaks down without sight of a lay-by it is likely to stop in a live running lane where it will be at increased risk of being hit from behind,” the AA says in a statement.  “If an HGV is parked up in the lay-by it makes it almost impossible for a car to safely enter the lay-by.”

Highways England has also reported a problem of drivers (in particular foreign trucks) parking in the ERAs when it is not an emergency. Some officials believe that a clearer name is needed for the lay-bys. When given selected names in the AA Populus poll, the most popular was Emergency Breakdown Area (49%), Emergency Refuge Area (21%) and Breakdown Area (9%).

Commenting, Edmund King OBE, AA president, said: “Four fifths of our members think that motorways without hard shoulders are more dangerous.  Whilst we support measures to improve motorway capacity, we do not think that safety should be compromised. We do not accept that the current criteria of an Emergency Refuge Area or exit at least every 2.6km is safe.

“Breaking down in a live running lane with trucks thundering up behind you is every driver’s worst nightmare. The official advice is to dial 999 which just shows how dangerous the situation can be.

“If drivers can see the next lay-by, they are much more likely to make it to the relative safety of that area even if their car has a puncture or is overheating. If they can’t see the lay-by, they often panic and stop in a live running lane. If more lay-bys are designed at the planning stage it will be less expensive and safer.

“Unprompted, our members came up with some scary names for the Emergency Refuge Areas – which indicates just how worried they are. It is time for the Government to go back to the drawing board and design a scheme acceptable to drivers.”

 

 
Comments

No comments yet.