Government auditors want more openness over road funding | Smart Highways Magazine: Industry News

Government auditors want more openness over road funding

Share this story...Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookShare on Google+Email this to someonePrint this pageBuffer this pagePin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on Tumblr

The National Audit Office (NAO) has warned that reforms to the Highways Agency will not be enough to stop the unpredictability of funding for road maintenance.

Funding pressures on highways authorities have encouraged efficiency and innovation in how budgets for road maintenance are spent, but public value will be lost unless funding becomes more predictable, according to a report by the NAO.

The actual reduction in budget for the Highways Agency, which maintains the strategic road network, will now be 7%, rather than the 19% announced in the Spending Review 2010, owing to injections of capital funding which have offset the reductions.

According to the NAO, however, the lack of predictability has practical implications and may cost more in the long term. Historically, local highway authorities spend more revenue on maintenance, but report that they now carry out fewer routine activities such as clearing gullies which are essential to preventing water seeping into roads’ sub-structure. In addition, road maintenance contractors have cited unpredictable income as a disincentive for them to invest in improving efficiency.

The current pattern of funding, combined with the need to spend money within the financial year, means that most road maintenance is carried out between September and March. Although this is less disruptive for road users, it is less efficient than carrying out the work at other times of year because materials can be more difficult to handle in cold and wet conditions, and daylight hours are shorter.

Additional funding for emergency repairs is also made available at the end of the financial year. As a result, almost all highways authorities need extra capacity from the market at the same time, making it less likely that they will obtain value for money.

The Department for Transport is planning to change the Agency’s status to that of a limited company wholly publicly owned by the government, with six-year funding certainty for capital projects and maintenance, and therefore the potential to achieve better value for money.

Although recent data showed that the surface condition of the strategic road network improved between 2003 and 2013, it may be that deterioration has not yet become visible. Road users’ satisfaction with the general upkeep of the network fell by 2% between 2011-12 and 2012-13 to 91%.

Head of the National Audit Office Amyas Morse said: “Stop/start funding makes long-term planning more difficult for highways authorities. The Department for Transport understands the threat posed to road maintenance from the uncertainty of funding, but establishing a new government company to address the problems will not, in itself, be enough. The Department should work with the Treasury and the Department for Communities and local government to address the unpredictability of funding for both the strategic and local road networks.”

 

REACTION:

Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) director general, Nick Baveystock, said: “The NAO rightly highlights the challenges in funding improvements to what is our most intensively used transport network – particularly the uncertainty that is caused by changes in overall funding settlements. The reformation of the Highways Agency, which will facilitate a shift from the costly and inefficient “stop start” pattern of investment, to a multi-year investment plan, will go some way to addressing these issues for the strategic network.

“It will do little to address the maintenance of our local road network however. Pressure on local authority budgets and a significant maintenance backlog, has created a reactive ‘quick fix’ culture that is more costly in long term. Government will need to commit to a long term preventative maintenance regime – but foremost, efforts to clear the backlog and learn lessons from schemes proving successful, must be stepped up.”

 

Asphalt Industry Alliance (AIA) chairman Alan Mackenzie said: “We welcome this report and support its recommendations. We have been campaigning for some time for increased and longer term funding for local authorities, aligned to highways asset management plans, and we are pleased to see this specifically highlighted in the report.

“We remain committed to helping improve the condition of the local road network by working together with all organisations, and supporting the Highways Maintenance Efficiency Programme in its drive to promote best practice and enhance efficiency.”

 
Comments

No comments yet.